Jeffrey J. Goldberger, MD @DrJGoldberger @UMiamiHealth #OBTAINRegistry #MyocardialInfarction #Cardiology #Heart #Research Comparison of Metoprolol versus Carvedilol After Acute Myocardial...

Jeffrey J. Goldberger, MD @DrJGoldberger @UMiamiHealth #OBTAINRegistry #MyocardialInfarction #Cardiology #Heart #Research Comparison of Metoprolol versus Carvedilol After Acute Myocardial...

User Photo
CardiologyNews

3 months
39 Views
Share
Want to watch this again later?
Sign in to add this video to a playlist. Login
0 0
Category:
Description:

Jeffrey J. Goldberger, MD, MBA from the University of Miami speaks about the Comparison of Metoprolol versus Carvedilol After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Link to Article -
https://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002-9149(21)00155-7/fulltext#%20

• Beta-blockers are commonly administered after a heart attack, but no one brand has been recommended.

• In this analysis, metoprolol and carvedilol are compared in a post-MI cohort.

• Carvedilol and metoprolol had comparable overall survival rates in the sample.

• In the ejection fraction 40 percent subgroup, carvedilol outperformed metoprolol in terms of survival.

Summary

Following a myocardial infarction (MI), beta-blockers are commonly prescribed, although no particular beta-blocker is recommended. 4142 patients were discharged on metoprolol and 1487 on carvedilol from the OBTAIN multi-center list of patients with acute MI. The beta-blocker dose was calculated as a percentage of the target daily dose used in randomized clinical trials (metoprolol 200 mg; carvedilol 50 mg). >0 percent -12.5 percent (n=1428), >12.5 percent -25 percent (n=2113), >25 percent -50 percent (n=1392), and >50 percent (n=696) were the beta-blocker dose classes. Three-year survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier equation. A multivariable adjustment was used to correct for baseline variations. Carvedilol patients were older (64.4 vs. 63.3 years) and had more comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, previous MI, congestive heart failure, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and a longer period of stay. The mean doses of metoprolol and carvedilol did not vary substantially (37.227.8% and 35.831.0%, respectively). The 3-year survival figures for metoprolol and carvedilol were 88.2% and 83.5 percent, respectively, with an unadjusted HR=0.72 (p0.0001), but HR=1.073 (p=0.43) after multivariable adjustment. In comparison to other dose ranges, patients in the >12.5-25 percent dose range had better survival. In a subgroup of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%, metoprolol was found to have a worse survival rate than carvedilol (adjusted HR=1.281; 95 percent CI: 1.024-1.602, p=0.03). There were no variations in survival between carvedilol and metoprolol in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%. Overall survival after acute MI was comparable in patients treated with metoprolol or carvedilol, but carvedilol could be superior in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%.

Up Next Autoplay